Friday, September 3, 2010

Okay, in this incredibly popular trilogy, this book is by far the best. I almost never think a book is worth 5 stars, but this one really is.

For one thing, this book contains a courtroom scene that left me completely riveted and I absolutely HATE courtroom scenes. I know nothing about the legal system in Sweden. Frankly, I know almost nothing about the legal system here, which is terrifying in my current situation (litigious divorce). However, the particular form of being able to question multiple people at once is what makes this courtroom scene unfold so dramatically and wonderfully.

The book packs all sorts of drama and action from the start without giving up too much of the character development. This book contains more "aha" moments that change or define characters than the other books, but it is compelled by the pace of the action. On the other hand, the end of the book is really good.

I usually find the endings of books either disappointing or trite. Mostly both. This book does something wonderful. Instead of ending at the thrilling resolution of the major action, the book takes us on a relaxing meander  for a bit to lull us into the character of the main person in the book. Then, the book adds a final little exciting moment and a resolution tied up with the standard distance developed in this character's personality. The ending is amazingly satisfying.

I highly recommend this book, but I highly recommend reading the others first. The entire trilogy is one of the few popular reads that is really worth the time. The book took me quite a long time to get through, but not remotely because it is slow. It took me forever because I work full-time and am raising two little kids. If not for that, I would probably have stayed up all night and finished it in one read. The story is so engaging that I suggest, if you can, putting the book down and savoring it over a couple of weeks. It will be an enjoyable couple of weeks.

Bookmark and Share
Tuesday, July 6, 2010

I read The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo a while ago. I was a little worried I wouldn't remember the story. I didn't. It didn't matter.

This was a great book. Steig Larsson winds an interesting tale and really propels you through the plot. The dialogue is pretty decent and the characters are truly interesting. The job he has done of creating the Lisbeth Salander character is great. As readers, we feel like the only ones in the world who know this mysterious person and only because we get to look through her eyes. Its a great device. Take someone totally closed off and put your reader in that person's head. You still can't understand that person, but you get an inside view that is irresistable.

A friend of mine told me that this is the only book he has stayed up all night reading in years. His 12-year-old daughter piped in that she stays up all night reading often. Ha! Yeah, we know. At 12, we stayed up all night reading all the time too. At 25, I stayed up all night reading. But, somehow, with the birth of my kids in my 30's, I was instantly transformed into my grandmother. I now fall asleep sitting on the couch while telling a story. Very sad. I don't stay up all night for anything now except aching muscles and anxiety.

So, I didn't stay up all night to read the book, but I did read it every time I had the chance until I finished it. I might have stayed up all night if it weren't for two reservations and what keeps me from giving the book 5 stars. First, some of the plot was predictable. I really hate reading a book and waiting for the idiotic characters to catch on to things I figured out 100 pages ago. Worse, I hate it when the devices the author is using become obvious as a result. That didn't happen with The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, but it did happen here. I won't spoil the book for anyone by telling the thing I knew, but lets just say that I had figured out who the main bad guy was long before it was revealed.

The second problem I had with the book was the same problem I had with the first one. I DO NOT LIKE gratuitous, detailed violence against women. Now, I know that in today's cultural experience, this is an almost critical standard. I don't like gratuitous violence against men either, but I get particularly sick when it involves women. Yes, Quentin Tarantino and I do not get along. Anyway, there is enough gratuitous violence in the book. I'm not saying that I think I could write or read this book without it, but there you have it. I also really hate court room scenes in both television and books. So, gratuitous violence and court room scenes will affect my enjoyment. We all have our little quirks.

Other than that, I recommend the book. Maybe don't encourage your 12-year-old daughter to stay up all night with it. But, for a decent adult read, it is pretty good. I have the next one. Maybe I should wait until I forget how this one ends.

Oh yeah. I almost forgot. The ending is pretty darn unbelieveable. Especially if you have anything of a medical background. C'est la vie. Hopefully, the next book makes me forget about these issues. I seem to have this problem with second books in the series a lot. I like them less than the first.

Bookmark and Share
Sunday, July 4, 2010

I have been reading a ton of random stuff lately. I picked this one up because I was doubtful. On the cover, it says that 1 in 25 Americans has no conscience. My thought was, "I seriously doubt that."

After reading the book, I still seriously doubt that assertion, but the book was great. The author does a great job. She has a couple of stated purposes. First, she looks at sociopathy and asks, "is this the better way?" After all, without a conscience, you don't have to worry about who you step on to get ahead and you don't have to feel bad about what you do. You can have amazing wealth and power without personal pain. Second, she addresses what to do if you know a sociopath and how to recognize one. A person without conscience doesn't have any obvious red flags. So, you may not have any idea you are dealing with one.

This all sounds like a bad guy/good guy book, but it isn't. This book isn't obvious or condemning. The saving grace is that question about the better way. The author thoughtfully addresses the question until the very last moment of the book.

SPOILER ALERT:

For the question of the better way, the author identifies a very interesting answer. She says that being a sociopath is really boring. Sociopaths are always bored with their lives. This may not seem to indicate a true answer. After all, a lot of wealth and fame for a little boredom? Why not?

The very end of the book addresses this. She talks about that human connection. The human connection that keeps the rest of us from being bored by filling us with the adrenaline of the interpersonal. The sociopath doesn't have that empathetic human connection. The author states,

Picture clearly the face of someone for whom you would run headlong into a burning building if this were required of you...Try to picture that same face....weeping in grief, or smiling in peace and joy.

And now imagine for a moment that you could look forever and feel absolutely nothing, no love, not desire to help or even to smile back.

The author goes on to say that the emotional hollowness is the boredom and the feelings that keep us so alive and vibrant come from our conscience and connection to others. The ability to feel life in the laugh of our kids or connect to the divine in the smile of our lovers comes from that connection. And she's right, suddenly all the wealth and power wouldn't be worth it.

As for protecting yourself, there's not a great answer here. She gives some suggestions. Some are more satisfying than others, but she mentions something in chapter 8 she calls "the Rule of Threes."

One lie, one broken promise, or a single neglected responsibility may be a misunderstanding instead. Two may involve a serious mistake. But three lies says you're dealing with a liar, and deceit is the linchpin of conscienceless behavior.

Basically, she says that you should treat three lies or broken promises the way you would foam on a dog's mouth. Get away. Yeah, the dog may be chewing on soap, but it's more likely rabid.

It was an interesting book, but a little scary. After all, since sociopaths are so hard to spot, you wouldn't know you are dealing with one until you are already being hurt by them. This is bad news if you really want to avoid one. On the other hand, I have serious concerns about her 1 in 25 assertion and so I suspect that we are all a little safer from dealing with them than the author would have us believe.

Bookmark and Share
Friday, June 4, 2010

Just finished The Host by Stephanie Meyer. Well, she's creative. I'll give her that. The story is basically about an alien who is part of the invasion of Earth. A nice counter-point to the perspective of only humand in the typical alien invasion stories.

The characters were well defined. The story propels you through. However, I am not the biggest fan of books which remind me often of the author and this is one. I also thought that the "gentle alien" was a little flat. These folks have been around for nearly ever, but they have never had the collective realization that they are an oppressive, invading force? For creatures so dedicated to being nice, that seems like a pretty big oversight.

I did enjoy the mix of sci fi and desert trek. That is always a good mix and I think the author has set herself up for a decent series, although not one with the amazing eroticism of her Twilight books. So, this will be less popular for that very reason, but not a bad read.

Bookmark and Share

Recent Posts

Follow me on:

Links to other sites

Syndicate

Syndicate content